View Full Version : Re: Cavalier seats
DuncanWood
10-24-2004, 02:24 AM
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 10:31:17 +0100, Guy King <guy.king@zetnet.co.uk> wrote:
> The message <f04w1GBXcPaBFwfr@ntlworld.com>
> from Peter Twydell <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> contains these words:
>
>> 1. Why?
>
> The seat belt is mounted to the seat and the seat then mounted to the
> floor. I suppose they're worried that it may be weakened in some way if
> you reuse the bolts.
>
> As to whether it's really necessary - no idea.
>
Don't the new ones come with threadlock on them?
Guy King
10-24-2004, 02:24 AM
The message <opsfnlcphfkx08km@amy>
from DuncanWood <freenews@dmx512.co.uk> contains these words:
> Don't the new ones come with threadlock on them?
If that's the only reason for using new bolts then I'd just put new
threadlock on 'em!
--
Skipweasel.
Being superstitious brings bad luck
Peter Twydell
10-24-2004, 02:24 AM
In article <31303030343237394169513841@zetnet.co.uk>, Guy King
<guy.king@zetnet.co.uk> writes
>The message <IYM1+fDEtTaBFw+P@ntlworld.com>
>from Peter Twydell <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> contains these words:
>
>
>> I do know that some engine rebuilds require new bolts, but I've never
>> been 100% sure why that is either, unless it's something to do with
>> their being softish and the threads getting worn when they're extracted?
>
>Some bolts are "stretch" bolts which elongate during the tightening
>process and this is allowed for in the tightening specifications. I
>suspect that if you were cunning you could devise another tightening
>spec which worked with old bolts.
>
>However, I've re-used bolts on various engines which allegedly need jew
>bolts and not come unstuck yet.
>
OK, stretching makes sense if there's a nut on the exposed far end,
doing the pulling and clamping parts together. ISTR seeing a TV
programme years ago that showed the then-new K Series engine using this
technique. What's the process if there's no tensile force on the bolt,
though? How can a "standard" cylinder head bolt stretch when going into
a blind hole??
--
Peter
Ying tong iddle-i po!
Mike G
10-24-2004, 02:24 AM
"Peter Twydell" <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:rMw97kF1gWaBFwKx@ntlworld.com...
> In article <31303030343237394169513841@zetnet.co.uk>, Guy King
> <guy.king@zetnet.co.uk> writes
> >The message <IYM1+fDEtTaBFw+P@ntlworld.com>
> >from Peter Twydell <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> contains these words:
> >
> >
> >> I do know that some engine rebuilds require new bolts, but I've never
> >> been 100% sure why that is either, unless it's something to do with
> >> their being softish and the threads getting worn when they're
extracted?
> >
> >Some bolts are "stretch" bolts which elongate during the tightening
> >process and this is allowed for in the tightening specifications. I
> >suspect that if you were cunning you could devise another tightening
> >spec which worked with old bolts.
> >
> >However, I've re-used bolts on various engines which allegedly need jew
> >bolts and not come unstuck yet.
> >
> OK, stretching makes sense if there's a nut on the exposed far end,
> doing the pulling and clamping parts together. ISTR seeing a TV
> programme years ago that showed the then-new K Series engine using this
> technique. What's the process if there's no tensile force on the bolt,
> though? How can a "standard" cylinder head bolt stretch when going into
> a blind hole??
There's always tensile force on tight bolts. Otherwise they wouldn't be
tight, and up to a point, all tight bolts are stretched. Blind hole or nut,
the same applies.
Same with cyl head bolts, they stretch because the torque required to twist
and break them, is greater than the resistance given by the thread.
Stretch bolts are designed to stretch to a point from which they don't
recover when removed. Restretching, weakens them. Therefore they shouldn't
be reused.
Mike.
Mike.
Peter Twydell
10-24-2004, 02:24 AM
In article <2stamgF1nocp2U1@uni-berlin.de>, Mike G
<mikgibbs@tiscali.co.uk> writes
>
>"Peter Twydell" <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:rMw97kF1gWaBFwKx@ntlworld.com...
>> In article <31303030343237394169513841@zetnet.co.uk>, Guy King
>> <guy.king@zetnet.co.uk> writes
>> >The message <IYM1+fDEtTaBFw+P@ntlworld.com>
>> >from Peter Twydell <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> contains these words:
>> >
>> >
>> >> I do know that some engine rebuilds require new bolts, but I've never
>> >> been 100% sure why that is either, unless it's something to do with
>> >> their being softish and the threads getting worn when they're
>extracted?
>> >
>> >Some bolts are "stretch" bolts which elongate during the tightening
>> >process and this is allowed for in the tightening specifications. I
>> >suspect that if you were cunning you could devise another tightening
>> >spec which worked with old bolts.
>> >
>> >However, I've re-used bolts on various engines which allegedly need jew
>> >bolts and not come unstuck yet.
>> >
>> OK, stretching makes sense if there's a nut on the exposed far end,
>> doing the pulling and clamping parts together. ISTR seeing a TV
>> programme years ago that showed the then-new K Series engine using this
>> technique. What's the process if there's no tensile force on the bolt,
>> though? How can a "standard" cylinder head bolt stretch when going into
>> a blind hole??
>
>There's always tensile force on tight bolts. Otherwise they wouldn't be
>tight, and up to a point, all tight bolts are stretched. Blind hole or nut,
>the same applies.
>Same with cyl head bolts, they stretch because the torque required to twist
>and break them, is greater than the resistance given by the thread.
>Stretch bolts are designed to stretch to a point from which they don't
>recover when removed. Restretching, weakens them. Therefore they shouldn't
>be reused.
>Mike.
>Mike.
>
>
OK, I get it now. I was forgetting the effect of the torque on the
threaded portion and considering only the head. Am I right in thinking
that what you're saying is that once the head is in contact with the
surface, the rest of the bolt is forced to turn in the thread when the
head is turned further, thereby moving down the thread and stretching ?
(Not elegantly expressed, but it's late and I'm still working)
--
Peter
Ying tong iddle-i po!
Mike G
10-25-2004, 05:09 PM
"Guy King" <guy.king@zetnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3130303034323739416A3FD375@zetnet.co.uk...
> The message <NidUgfBDIZaBFw9c@ntlworld.com>
> from Peter Twydell <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> contains these words:
>
> > Am I right in thinking
> > that what you're saying is that once the head is in contact with the
> > surface, the rest of the bolt is forced to turn in the thread when the
> > head is turned further, thereby moving down the thread and stretching ?
>
> Yes.
Do you have to be so verbose?
Mike.
Guy King
10-25-2004, 05:09 PM
The message <2tcr1dF1ujquhU1@uni-berlin.de>
from "Mike G" <mikgibbs@tiscali.co.uk> contains these words:
> > Yes.
> Do you have to be so verbose?
No.
--
Skipweasel.
Being superstitious brings bad luck
Peter Twydell
10-25-2004, 05:09 PM
In article <2tcr1dF1ujquhU1@uni-berlin.de>, Mike G
<mikgibbs@tiscali.co.uk> writes
>
>"Guy King" <guy.king@zetnet.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:3130303034323739416A3FD375@zetnet.co.uk...
>> The message <NidUgfBDIZaBFw9c@ntlworld.com>
>> from Peter Twydell <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> contains these words:
>>
>> > Am I right in thinking
>> > that what you're saying is that once the head is in contact with the
>> > surface, the rest of the bolt is forced to turn in the thread when the
>> > head is turned further, thereby moving down the thread and stretching ?
>>
>> Yes.
>
>Do you have to be so verbose?
>Mike.
>
>
Would you please tell me why that's verbose?
If you can explain it better and just as accurately, why didn't you?
--
Peter
Ying tong iddle-i po!
Guy King
10-25-2004, 05:09 PM
The message <U5GiWlA1PicBFwf9@ntlworld.com>
from Peter Twydell <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> contains these words:
> Would you please tell me why that's verbose?
He was taking the mickey out of my one word answer. Don't worry, those
of us behind this glass screen in front of you like to play sometimes.
--
Skipweasel.
Being superstitious brings bad luck
Peter Twydell
10-25-2004, 05:09 PM
In article <31303030343237394172476161@zetnet.co.uk>, Guy King
<guy.king@zetnet.co.uk> writes
>The message <U5GiWlA1PicBFwf9@ntlworld.com>
>from Peter Twydell <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> contains these words:
>
>> Would you please tell me why that's verbose?
>
>He was taking the mickey out of my one word answer. Don't worry, those
>of us behind this glass screen in front of you like to play sometimes.
>
D'oh!
Made a right prat of myself there. Don't know why I thought Mike was
replying to me; must be senile paranoia. I can also claim pressure of
work and the birth on Friday of our first granddaughter.
Normal service will be resumed as soon as possible. (and if you remember
that you're at least as old as I am)
--
Peter
Ying tong iddle-i po!
Guy King
10-25-2004, 05:09 PM
The message <TCwT4UJuUrcBFwtf@ntlworld.com>
from Peter Twydell <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> contains these words:
> Ying tong iddle-i po!
It's a publicity stunt.
--
Skipweasel.
In the beginning was the word.
And the word was Aardvark.
Mike G
10-25-2004, 05:09 PM
"Peter Twydell" <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:TCwT4UJuUrcBFwtf@ntlworld.com...
> In article <31303030343237394172476161@zetnet.co.uk>, Guy King
> <guy.king@zetnet.co.uk> writes
> >The message <U5GiWlA1PicBFwf9@ntlworld.com>
> >from Peter Twydell <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> contains these words:
> >
> >> Would you please tell me why that's verbose?
> >
> >He was taking the mickey out of my one word answer. Don't worry, those
> >of us behind this glass screen in front of you like to play sometimes.
> >
>
> D'oh!
> Made a right prat of myself there. Don't know why I thought Mike was
> replying to me; must be senile paranoia. I can also claim pressure of
> work and the birth on Friday of our first granddaughter.
> Normal service will be resumed as soon as possible. (and if you remember
> that you're at least as old as I am)
Seems like only yesterday.
Nostalgia aint wot it uset to be.
Mike.
Peter Twydell
10-25-2004, 05:09 PM
In article <2tgadmF1ut598U1@uni-berlin.de>, Mike G
<mikgibbs@tiscali.co.uk> writes
>
>"Peter Twydell" <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:TCwT4UJuUrcBFwtf@ntlworld.com...
>> In article <31303030343237394172476161@zetnet.co.uk>, Guy King
>> <guy.king@zetnet.co.uk> writes
>> >The message <U5GiWlA1PicBFwf9@ntlworld.com>
>> >from Peter Twydell <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> contains these words:
>> >
>> >> Would you please tell me why that's verbose?
>> >
>> >He was taking the mickey out of my one word answer. Don't worry, those
>> >of us behind this glass screen in front of you like to play sometimes.
>> >
>>
>> D'oh!
>> Made a right prat of myself there. Don't know why I thought Mike was
>> replying to me; must be senile paranoia. I can also claim pressure of
>> work and the birth on Friday of our first granddaughter.
>> Normal service will be resumed as soon as possible. (and if you remember
>> that you're at least as old as I am)
>
>Seems like only yesterday.
>
>Nostalgia aint wot it uset to be.
>Mike.
>
Right. Back then when Muffin the Mule was a puppet, and not something
perverts did on reality TV shows. Mind you, I was always suspicious
about that bloke in the stripy suit, who lived in a basket with a little
girl and a bear.
--
Peter
Ying tong iddle-i po!
Guy King
10-25-2004, 05:09 PM
The message <2tgadmF1ut598U1@uni-berlin.de>
from "Mike G" <mikgibbs@tiscali.co.uk> contains these words:
> Nostalgia aint wot it uset to be.
What did we do before we had nostalgia?
--
Skipweasel.
In the beginning was the word.
And the word was Aardvark.
Guy King
10-25-2004, 05:09 PM
The message <prRNiUZpu2cBFw5y@ntlworld.com>
from Peter Twydell <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> contains these words:
> Mind you, I was always suspicious
> about that bloke in the stripy suit, who lived in a basket with a little
> girl and a bear.
Lloyed George?
--
Skipweasel.
In the beginning was the word.
And the word was Aardvark.
Peter Twydell
10-25-2004, 05:09 PM
In article <31303030343237394173803577@zetnet.co.uk>, Guy King
<guy.king@zetnet.co.uk> writes
>The message <prRNiUZpu2cBFw5y@ntlworld.com>
>from Peter Twydell <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> contains these words:
>
>> Mind you, I was always suspicious
>> about that bloke in the stripy suit, who lived in a basket with a little
>> girl and a bear.
>
>Lloyed George?
>
Lloyd loom? Lloyd George knew my father...
--
Peter
Ying tong iddle-i po!
Guy King
10-25-2004, 05:09 PM
The message <J6TVGEFnKAdBFwU7@ntlworld.com>
from Peter Twydell <Peter@nospam.demon.co.uk> contains these words:
> Lloyd loom?
Cor, you don't see a lot of that about these days.
--
Skipweasel.
In the beginning was the word.
And the word was Aardvark.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.9 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.