Notices
Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 159 Opening Thoughts

  1. #1 Default 159 Opening Thoughts 
    Zathras Guest
    There were a couple of 159s in our local showroom today so I had a
    look. A 1.9JTS and a 2.4JTDm. I thought they looked much better in the
    metal than in the pictures I've seen.

    It's not as photogenic as the 156 was. The front of the car is much
    more 'in your face' than the 156 front. However, cleaning all the
    detail bits round the lights and grills looks like a power wash or
    toothbrush job (thanks a lot for that Geo!).

    The standard 17 inch wheels (toothbrushes required again) didn't seem
    to fit as snuggly in the wheel arches as I was expecting and the cars
    both looked high off the ground especially at the back.

    The door handles do feel nice but they are a bit ordinary really.
    Where the 156 said 'I want to be different' this car is much more
    about being similar. I suppose the exception is the front end but, to
    be honest, the relative dullness of the rest of the car makes you gasp
    when you walk round and get to the extrovert front. It just seems a
    little unbalanced to me.

    Inside, there was some odd positioning of switchgear - the fog light
    switches have moved to where the fuse box cover is on the 156 but they
    looked a bit out of the way on the underside slope of the dash. Other
    than that, the inside will not seem unfamiliar to 156 owners. This
    also includes a dire lack of space in the back if the front passengers
    are tall. The front seats on one of the show cars were sufficiently
    far back that I could not envisage someone actually getting their feet
    and legs in the back foot wells.

    As usual, there's a shortage of leather on the doors so anyone not
    going for black leather will have little patches of coloured leather
    on their doors.

    Looking at the options list (something that's grown out of all
    proportion since the 156), the external colours are disappointingly
    dreary with little choice (Alfa Red and a light silver seemed the only
    viable bright colours). Several options (like a sunroof) are not
    available at launch.

    So what's my gut feeling - I'm really under whelmed actually! I came
    away thinking it was far too much like a face lifted 156 and not a new
    car.

    There's also some info now filtering out on the net hinting that Alfa
    may be at it again with the hyperbole (no it wasn't the centre of
    attention at a certain car show) and, yes, it appears that the
    suspension settings on the 2.2JTS are too under damped for UK roads.
    However, Alfa do learn SOME things and all the petrol engines now come
    with the reassurance of chain driven cams! Yippee.

    From the specs, the 2.4JTDm appears to be carrying a VERY similar
    mechanical specification (brakes etc) to the 3.2JTS. The word on the
    street is that the 2.4JTDm is the one to buy - the 3.2 is held back by
    its weight (it now has 4WD ), the 2.2JTS by suspect suspension. The
    1.9JTDm is also a contender.

    The equivalent car to mine is now 10,000UKP more than mine was
    so..er..I think I'll wait and let someone else get punched in the face
    with the early years Alfa depreciation.

    What a disappointment really...

    --
    Z
    Scotland
    Alfa Romeo 156 2.4JTD Veloce Leather
    'Oil' be seeing you..
    (Email without 'Alfa' in subject are auto-deleted..sorry!)
    Reply With Quote  

  2. #2 Default Re: 159 Opening Thoughts 
    Tony Rickard Guest
    Zathras wrote:
    > There were a couple of 159s in our local showroom today so I had a
    > look. A 1.9JTS and a 2.4JTDm. I thought they looked much better in the
    > metal than in the pictures I've seen.


    I test drove a 1.9JTDm last week. Owning a 2.5 V6 156 it was the wrong
    engine to impress me, I was hoping to try the 2.4JTDm. Without wishing
    to upset 1.9JTD owners I find that engine a bit too ordinary even though
    it performs well enough.

    My lasting memories? The console is much more imposing - it still
    contains the guages which I like but is much larger and even more angled
    towards the driver, containing the fashionable large buttons. All
    ergonomically good but lacks some of the style of the 156 IMHO. Gone are
    the chrome air con controls on the face lifted 156 interior of 2002
    which is a shame.

    The stalks contain more controls and are rectangular rather than rounded
    and the steering wheel contains a much larger boss.

    Gone are the deep cowled instruments with much shallower affairs. The
    dash is a more integral unit with speedo, rev counter and computer
    display, I would have preferred a more distinctive style like the 156.

    One of the most noticeable differences from the 156 are the huge
    squarish door mirrors. The 156 mirrors were very stylish, these look
    functional but not Alfa

    Other than that I felt externally it looked pretty good with its wide
    arches, though the rear lights looked a little too Japanese for my
    tastes. Although larger it didn't have that bloated look of the latest 3
    series BMW.

    Driving it is certainly more supple than the Veloce 156, a TI pack will
    follow with lowered stiffer suspension. My 156 felt more sporty at the
    expense of a harsher ride. The 159 felt a better family car.

    My overriding opinion was this was a car designed to take on the German
    and Japanese models at some expense to the Alfisti. The dash
    immediately in front of the driver is less distinctive than the
    156/147/GT and is not dissimilar to the new Passat. The heater controls
    could have come off a Mazda 6 and the rear lights are a hybrid between
    the old 156 and an Accord. Fortunately the steering wheel control remain
    fairly subtle compared with other makes.

    The 159 is the first Alfa produced under new Chief Exec Karl-Heinz
    Kalbfell, a former director at BMW. On the basis he said of Alfa "you
    cant find financially-minded people in this company it's full of
    engineers, who all want to launch new cars and dont want to deal with
    the boring bits in between. Perhaps Alfa has a little too much spirit
    for non-Alfisti, in its appearance, driving style and temperament."
    maybe it is not surprising the 159 feels a little less Italian than its
    predecessor?

    Having said that the 2.4JTDm is one hell of a spec - 200bhp and 400nm
    with the distinctive 5 cylinder engine sound. Plus the Q4 makes for an
    interesting option (standard on the 3.2 petrol now and an option on the
    2.4 diesel later in the year), the salesman raved about his drive of the
    3.2 Q4 on the test track in Milan (Perry McCarthy - the original stig -
    was there - he wrote off a Brera!).

    My conclusion was similar to Zathras, no rush to trade in my 156, but
    I'll reserve judgement until I drive the 2.4JTDm or 3.2 Q4

    Cheers
    Tony
    Reply With Quote  

  3. #3 Default Re: 159 Opening Thoughts 
    Barry Bingham Guest
    Zathras wrote:

    > Inside, there was some odd positioning of switchgear -


    I agree. Did you clock the remote boot release?: It is a tiny switch in
    a bank of switches above the rear view mirror - most of them controlling
    the interior lighting. I can see it now: fumbling in the dark to turn on
    the interior lights only to hear boot ping open and a trip to the rear
    to close the thing.... again and again.
    >
    > What a disappointment really...


    Yes and No.

    Yes - front apart it is externally far too ordinary: the bastard
    offspring of a marriage between a 156 and a generic Beemer. But we
    forget in complaining just how extraordinarily beautiful and
    aesthetically balanced the 156 was... and is. Only familiarity has
    dulled our appreciation. It was always unlikely that Alfa could out-156
    the aesthetics with the replacement.

    No - tremendous seats. I have never found it so easy to become quickly
    comfortable in a drivers seat. The promise of a better ride (not had the
    test drive yet). Boring stuff: a usefully large boot. Feels very solid.
    5-star NACAP crash results. All very good day to day stuff, but adding
    to the sense of something German lurking in the genes....

    Like Tony, nothing to make me rush to dropping the 156. Not sure the
    greater utility and comfort will ever be enough to outweight the joy I
    still feel everytime I see my nuvola 156. People still look and comment
    on it even after over five years and three quarters of a million 156s on
    Europe's roads. I don't think a 159 would turn heads in the same way in
    any colour: and, yes, where is the iridiescent option???

    OTOH, no more 36K cambelt swaps, no more disintegrating
    wishbones/bushes, a ride that leaves my fillings in place over the
    broken stuff (? - so I'm told)...... like I said, Yes and No. But take
    away the flaws in a car and generally for some reason the character
    seeps away with the gremlins...
    Reply With Quote  

  4. #4 Default Re: 159 Opening Thoughts 
    Stephen Poley Guest
    On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:33:18 GMT, Zathras
    <webnewsgroup@nospamthanks.hotmail.com> wrote:

    >There were a couple of 159s in our local showroom today so I had a
    >look. A 1.9JTS and a 2.4JTDm. I thought they looked much better in the
    >metal than in the pictures I've seen.


    Agreed.

    >The door handles do feel nice but they are a bit ordinary really.
    >Where the 156 said 'I want to be different' this car is much more
    >about being similar. I suppose the exception is the front end but, to
    >be honest, the relative dullness of the rest of the car makes you gasp
    >when you walk round and get to the extrovert front. It just seems a
    >little unbalanced to me.


    Question of taste of course. I think it looks very good, though I agree
    the back doesn't quite match up to the front.

    >Looking at the options list (something that's grown out of all
    >proportion since the 156), the external colours are disappointingly
    >dreary with little choice (Alfa Red and a light silver seemed the only
    >viable bright colours).


    I really agree with you on this one. The entire car-owning world (well,
    at least on the evidence of the roads in the Netherlands) seems to be
    competing to be as boring as possible as far as colours are concerned.
    Most large and medium cars, and quite a lot of small ones, seem to be in
    one of the colours Pale Fog Grey, Dark Mud Grey, Boring Blackish-Blue or
    Hearse Black. And now even Alfa seems to be going the same way. Quite
    bizarre.

    Still - at least it's getting easier and easier to find my car in a
    large car-park.

    --
    Stephen Poley
    Reply With Quote  

  5. #5 Default Re: 159 Opening Thoughts 
    Zathras Guest
    On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 06:50:06 +0000, Barry Bingham
    <simca75_nospam@operamail.com> wrote:

    >Zathras wrote:
    >
    >> Inside, there was some odd positioning of switchgear -

    >
    >I agree. Did you clock the remote boot release?


    Missed that one!

    >: It is a tiny switch in
    >a bank of switches above the rear view mirror - most of them controlling
    >the interior lighting. I can see it now: fumbling in the dark to turn on
    >the interior lights only to hear boot ping open and a trip to the rear
    >to close the thing.... again and again.


    FFS!

    >>
    >> What a disappointment really...

    >
    >Yes and No.
    >
    >Yes - front apart it is externally far too ordinary: the bastard
    >offspring of a marriage between a 156 and a generic Beemer. But we
    >forget in complaining just how extraordinarily beautiful and
    >aesthetically balanced the 156 was... and is.


    I don't.

    > Only familiarity has dulled our appreciation.


    Perhaps. But then you park next to some other new pose-mobile and you
    see it still holds its own.

    >It was always unlikely that Alfa could out-156
    >the aesthetics with the replacement.


    I always said that from the moment I got my 156. I wonder if
    Pininfarina might have made a better job. For me Guigaro blows too hot
    and cold. And STILL you get the tacky boast sticker on the front
    wing!!!

    >No - tremendous seats. I have never found it so easy to become quickly
    >comfortable in a drivers seat. The promise


    Don't lose sight of reality - these are *ALFA promises*!

    >of a better ride (not had the test drive yet).


    That'll be interesting if you get the 'dodgy' 2.2JTS to try.

    >Boring stuff: a usefully large boot. Feels very solid.
    >5-star NACAP crash results. All very good day to day stuff, but adding
    >to the sense of something German lurking in the genes....
    >
    >Like Tony, nothing to make me rush to dropping the 156. Not sure the
    >greater utility and comfort will ever be enough to outweight the joy I
    >still feel everytime I see my nuvola 156. People still look and comment
    >on it even after over five years and three quarters of a million 156s on
    >Europe's roads. I don't think a 159 would turn heads in the same way in
    >any colour: and, yes, where is the iridiescent option???
    >
    >OTOH, no more 36K cambelt swaps, no more disintegrating
    >wishbones/bushes, a ride that leaves my fillings in place over the
    >broken stuff (? - so I'm told)...... like I said, Yes and No. But take
    >away the flaws in a car and generally for some reason the character
    >seeps away with the gremlins...


    er..ask anyone with a petrol cambelt failure if they'd rather have the
    'character'. 'Cr@p' and 'character' shouldn't be mistaken, but often
    are, for the same thing. As for the bushes..we shall see....

    --
    Z
    Scotland
    Alfa Romeo 156 2.4JTD Veloce Leather
    'Oil' be seeing you..
    (Email without 'Alfa' in subject are auto-deleted..sorry!)
    Reply With Quote  

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts